Nexortest Technologies | Your Gateway to Global Market Entry

◆ Software as Medical Device

SaMD Regulatory Consulting & Certification

Navigate the complex regulatory landscape for Software as a Medical Device, AI/ML diagnostics, and digital health products across FDA, EU MDR, CDSCO, and 30+ global markets.

What Is SaMD and Why Does It Need Regulatory Approval?

Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) is software intended to perform medical functions independently — without being part of a hardware device. As defined by the IMDRF, SaMD includes diagnostic algorithms, AI-powered imaging analysis, clinical decision support systems, and patient monitoring applications.

SaMD is regulated as a medical device in every major market. The classification, approval pathway, clinical evidence requirements, and post-market obligations depend on the risk level of the software’s clinical application.

Our Services

Our SaMD Consulting Services

End-to-end regulatory support from concept to market across global jurisdictions

SaMD Classification & Strategy

Determine your SaMD classification across FDA, EU MDR, CDSCO, and target markets. Define the optimal regulatory pathway — 510(k), De Novo, CE marking, or CDSCO Class C/D. Identify clinical evidence requirements early.

Dossier and Regulatory Submission

Complete preparation of regulatory submissions: FDA 510(k)/De Novo packages, EU MDR technical documentation, CDSCO Form MD-15, and other market-specific dossiers. Software-specific documentation including IEC 62304 lifecycle files.

AI/ML Device Guidance

Specialized support for AI/ML-based SaMD: predetermined change control plans (PCCP), algorithm validation protocols, training data documentation, bias assessment, and locked vs. adaptive algorithm strategies.

Cybersecurity Documentation

Complete cybersecurity premarket documentation: threat modeling, SBOM (Software Bill of Materials), vulnerability assessment, security architecture, penetration testing coordination, and FDA cybersecurity guidance compliance.

Clinical Evidence Strategy

Design your clinical evidence package: analytical validation study design, clinical performance evaluation, real-world data strategies, literature reviews, and clinical investigation protocol development where required.

QMS & IEC 62304 Implementation

Implement ISO 13485 with SaMD-specific processes: IEC 62304 software lifecycle, agile-to-design-controls mapping, software risk management (ISO 14971), configuration management, and CAPA for software defects.

Classification

SaMD Classification Across Markets

How SaMD is classified differently by FDA, EU MDR, and CDSCO

SaMD Type FDA (US) EU MDR CDSCO (India) Risk Level
General wellness / lifestyle Not regulated as device Not regulated as device Not regulated None
Clinical decision support (non-critical) Class I / Exempt Class IIa (Rule 11) Class A/B Low
Diagnostic imaging AI (non-life-threatening) Class II / 510(k) Class IIa/IIb (Rule 11) Class B/C Medium
AI-powered triage / stroke detection Class II / De Novo Class IIb (Rule 11) Class C Medium-High
Digital therapeutics (treatment) Class II / De Novo Class IIa/IIb Class B/C Medium
Cardiac monitoring / arrhythmia detection Class II / 510(k) Class IIb/III (Rule 11) Class C/D High
Cancer diagnostic AI / treatment planning Class II-III / PMA or De Novo Class III (Rule 11) Class D High
Companion diagnostics software Class III / PMA Class C (IVDR) Class C/D High
Our Process

Key Standards for SaMD Compliance

The technical standards your SaMD must comply with for regulatory approval

1
IEC 62304 — Software Lifecycle

Defines software development, maintenance, and risk management processes. Classifies software safety into Classes A, B, C. Required by FDA, EU MDR, CDSCO, and most global regulators. Integrates with ISO 14971 for risk management.

2
ISO 14971 — Risk Management

Comprehensive risk management process for medical devices including SaMD. Covers hazard identification, risk estimation, risk evaluation, risk control, and residual risk assessment. Required by all major regulatory authorities.

3
IEC 81001-5-1 — Health Software Security

Cybersecurity lifecycle requirements for health software. Covers secure design, threat modeling, vulnerability management, security testing, and incident response. Referenced by FDA cybersecurity guidance and EU MDR requirements.

4
IEC 82304-1 — Health Software Products

Requirements for health software products intended for use outside of hardware medical devices. Covers software safety classification, verification and validation, user documentation, and release management.

5
ISO 13485 — Quality Management System

QMS standard with SaMD-specific requirements for design controls, configuration management, software CAPA, and post-market surveillance. The foundation for all SaMD regulatory submissions.

6
IMDRF SaMD Framework

International Medical Device Regulators Forum guidance on SaMD definition, classification, QMS, and clinical evaluation. Adopted by FDA, Health Canada, TGA, and increasingly by CDSCO as the basis for SaMD regulation.

AI/ML Medical Device Regulation

AI/ML-based SaMD products face unique regulatory challenges. Adaptive algorithms that learn and evolve require special regulatory frameworks that traditional software approval pathways weren’t designed for.

NexorTest’s team stays current with the rapidly evolving AI/ML regulatory landscape across all major markets, including the FDA’s predetermined change control plan (PCCP) framework, CDSCO’s 2025-2026 AI/ML guidance, and EU MDR requirements for continuously learning systems.

Why Choose

Why NexorTest for SaMD?

Unlike consulting-only firms, we provide end-to-end support from design through approval

🌎
Multi-Market, Single Strategy

One regulatory strategy and documentation set designed to satisfy FDA, EU MDR, CDSCO, UKCA, TGA, and SFDA simultaneously. Reduces cost by 40-60% vs. managing each market separately.

🛠
Design + Regulatory + Testing

We support your SaMD from regulatory design architecture through IEC 62304 lifecycle implementation, cybersecurity testing, and final submission. One team, one timeline, zero coordination gaps.

🤖
AI/ML Specialization

Dedicated AI/ML regulatory expertise covering FDA PCCP framework, CDSCO 2025-2026 AI guidance, EU MDR clinical evaluation for ML algorithms, and algorithm validation study design.

Frequently Asked Questions

SaMD FAQ

Common questions about Software as a Medical Device regulation

SaMD is software intended to be used for medical purposes without being part of a hardware medical device. Examples include AI-powered radiology software, ECG analysis algorithms, diabetes management apps, clinical decision support systems, and digital therapeutics. SaMD is distinct from Software in a Medical Device (SiMD), which is embedded within hardware.

The FDA classifies SaMD as Class I (low risk, often exempt), Class II (moderate risk, 510(k) or De Novo), or Class III (high risk, PMA). Classification is based on the IMDRF framework considering the significance of the information provided and the seriousness of the healthcare situation. The FDA’s Digital Health Center of Excellence handles SaMD submissions.

Yes. Under EU MDR Rule 11, SaMD is classified as Class IIa, IIb, or III depending on the clinical decision impact. Class IIa and above require Notified Body involvement. Clinical evaluation, technical documentation, IEC 62304 compliance, and cybersecurity documentation are all mandatory for CE marking.

CDSCO regulates SaMD under MDR 2017 with specific AI/ML guidance issued in October 2025 and January 2026. SaMD ranges from Class A to Class D. Applications go through SUGAM portal using Form MD-14 (Class A/B) or MD-15 (Class C/D). Clinical evidence, IEC 62304, and cybersecurity documentation are required.

Yes. We design a single regulatory strategy covering FDA, EU MDR, CDSCO, UKCA, TGA, and SFDA simultaneously, significantly reducing cost and time-to-market. We also provide the underlying QMS (ISO 13485) and testing support, making NexorTest a true single-window SaMD partner.

IEC 62304 is the standard for medical device software lifecycle processes covering development, maintenance, risk management, and configuration management. It classifies software safety into Classes A, B, C. Compliance is required or referenced by all major regulatory authorities for SaMD approval.

AI/ML devices face additional requirements: FDA’s predetermined change control plan (PCCP) for algorithm updates, training data documentation, bias assessment, algorithm validation, transparency/explainability documentation, and real-world performance monitoring. EU MDR and CDSCO have issued specific 2025-2026 guidance for AI/ML devices.

SaMD must include: threat modeling, security architecture, SBOM (Software Bill of Materials), vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, encryption/authentication controls, patch management plan, and incident response procedures. The FDA, EU MDR, and IEC 81001-5-1 all have specific cybersecurity requirements.

Clinical evidence includes analytical validation (algorithm performance on test data), clinical validation (real-world clinical performance), and clinical evaluation. For AI/ML: training data representativeness, sensitivity/specificity metrics, multi-site validation, and comparison against reference standards are required.

Ready to Bring Your SaMD to Market?

Get a free SaMD regulatory pathway assessment. Our specialists will evaluate your software, classify it across target markets, and provide a clear roadmap to approval.

Scroll to Top